Online argumentation

-
I choose this argument as it was the first one that came up on my For you page on my tik tok. I feel its very telling that it only takes one or so video to find an argument in a comment section. The video was controversial but I thought the Grammer attack was telling.

Three Negative aspects of this Argument 

  1. Oversimplification and Generalization: This comment generalizes an entire group’s behavior and beliefs, which shuts down constructive discussion and reinforces stereotypes. It assumes all reactions will be the same without room for nuance or individual perspective.

  2. Dramatic and Emotionally Charged Language: While emotional responses are valid, phrasing like “fell low” with broken-heart emojis dramatizes disagreement and implies betrayal or degradation, which can escalate tensions rather than foster understanding.

  3. Mockery and Dismissiveness The single-word reply with a crying emoji mocks the prior speaker’s tone or word choice. Sarcasm and ridicule can undermine serious points and make people feel disrespected or silenced especially when some people may be English language learners or not as educated in Grammer.

Five Rules for More Constructive Online Arguments:

  1. Engage with Ideas, Not Identities: Critique arguments, not the person making them. Avoid assumptions based on someone’s identity or background.

  2. Use Respectful and Thoughtful Language: Choose words that express disagreement without demeaning or mocking. Be mindful of tone as what feels like a joke to one person can be offensive to another.

  3. Seek Understanding, Not Just to Win: Ask clarifying questions instead of making accusations. The goal should be mutual understanding, not domination.

  4. Avoid Generalizations and Stereotyping: Speak from your perspective and avoid saying “they always...” or “everyone thinks...” as this erases individual experiences and creates division.

  5. Acknowledge Valid Points: Even in disagreement, find areas of agreement or merit. A simple “I see your point, but...” goes a long way toward a civil exchange.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Prensky's immigrant/native divide

-
Image
  I’m someone who checks my phone first thing in the morning and probably scrolls more than I should and I totally get why Marc Prensky coined the term “digital native” back in 2001. It captures something true about how comfortable we are with technology. But after reading more especially from Paul Kirschner’s side of the debate, I think we’ve been overly romanticizing this idea. Prensky argued that today’s students think and process information differently because we’ve grown up with tech. He painted a picture of a generational divide between tech-savvy natives and outdated immigrants. But Kirschner—along with a lot of recent research, completely busts this myth wide open. Comfort with tech doesn’t equal competence. Just because I can upload a TikTok or troubleshoot Wi-Fi doesn’t mean I instinctively know how to critically read online sources or manage my time across five browser tabs. One of the most damaging myths Prensky promoted, according to Kirschner, is that we’re all expe...
Read more

About Me

-
Image
Hi everyone! My name is Seraphina Naefke. I am a sophomore studying English and Education with a minor in History at Oregon State University. I am originally from Redondo Beach, California but currently reside in Corvallis for school. I took public speaking my freshman year and while I can't say I loved it I did learn a lot. When communicating I primarily use Snapchat and Instagram. In my free time I love to go to the beach and surf. An interesting fact about me is that I have three older brothers and recently became an auntie!
Read more

Social media

-
Image
            I think the internet has completely changed the way we form opinions and talk to each other. It used to be that we heard about major issues from the news or maybe a teacher or parent. Now it feels like opinions come at us nonstop through TikToks, tweets, and Instagram stories. To me, this makes everything feel faster and more intense. Public opinion can shift in a matter of hours, depending on what’s trending or who posts what.      Social media doesn’t just share ideas, it sells them. The way something is said matters just as much as what’s being said. I think that’s why people care so much about aesthetics and tone. Pearson et al. (2021) say that persuasive messages work best when they connect emotionally with the audience, and I definitely see that all the time. Posts that go viral usually tap into feelings like anger, pride, or hope. To me, that kind of emotional pull is powerful, but it can also be manipulative if we’re ...
Read more